Comparison of door-to-needle time of Tenecteplase & Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Protocol
Principal Investigators: Loren Pattillo-Lee, PharmD, Fiona Asigbee, PhD, MPH, MEd, and Stacey Campbell, PharmD, MPH, BCPS.
The treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has long been comprised of a single thrombolytic medication, Alteplase . In 2019, the American Heart and American Stroke Associations updated the AIS guidelines to include a recommendation for the use of Tenecteplase as an alternative to Alteplase.
Figure 1. Treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) focuses on restoration of blood flow and improvement of perfusion to the affected region of the brain. This figure depicts two forms of AIS treatments: (1) Alteplase-a mechanical thrombectomy or IV Thrombolytics treatment, and (2) Tenecteplase – a thrombolytic treatment. This figure depicts the period of time after onset that each form of treatment takes.
There were concerns about delays in therapy with the use of Alteplase due to the lengthy reconstitution process, dosing, and administration of a bolus and continuous infusion. Tenecteplase is administered via an intravenous (IV) push and reconstitution is less labor intensive which may result in more timely administration. In August 2022, Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital (SBCH) transitioned from using Alteplase to Tenecteplase for management of AIS due to comparable efficacy, ease of administration, and similar safety profiles for both medications.
Study Objective: The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine the door-to-needle time for Tenecteplase and Alteplase when used for management of AIS. Methods: Data for this single center, retrospective study were obtained from adults admitted to the SBCH Emergency Department (ED) between November 1, 2021 to August 30, 2023 for management of AIS. Cohort 1 consisted of the protocol pre-implementation group (Alteplase group) from November 1, 2021 to August 30, 2022 and cohort 2 consisted of the post- implementation group (Tenecteplase group) from November 1, 2022 to August 30, 2023. Results: Of the 134 patients that were screened for enrollment, 34 patients were treated with Alteplase and 27 patients were treated with Tenecteplase.
The Alteplase group was 53% male and 74% White with a mean age of 76.1 ± 13.6.The Tenecteplase group was 54% female and 78% White with a mean age of 73.5 ± 15.8. The door to needle time of Tenecteplase was approximately 10 minutes less than the door to needle time of Alteplase.
Figure 2. Depiction of difference in door to needle time of Alteplase and Tenecteplase. The door to needle time for Tenecteplase was approximately 10 minutes less than the door to needle time for Alteplase.
Hospital length of stay was shorter for patients that were administered Tenecteplase compared to Alteplase (5 days vs. 8 days, respectively). There was also a difference in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale/Score (NIHSS), the primary measure of post stroke neurological function improvement, for the two drugs. Tenecteplase had a mean difference of 5.11 from the first NIHSS score to the last NIHSS score. Alteplase had a mean difference of 4.45 from the first NIHSS score to the last NIHSS score.
Conclusion: The transition from Alteplase to Tenecteplase has proved beneficial at SBCH with a 10-minute decrease in door to needle time. These findings showcase a possible connection between the efficacy of Tenecteplase and the reduction of door-to-needle time, a decrease in length of hospital stay, and comparable improvement in neurological function at discharge in the management of AIS. Future studies should aim for larger sample sizes and have better patient compliance if comparing neurological outcomes.
This study was accepted for an oral presentation at the 2023 Western States Conference in San Diego, California.